FAB RESEARCH COMMENT:
Fish and seafood are
a rich source of key nutrients that are biologically essential for optimal brain development including iodine, vitamin B12, iron, vitamin D, zinc, manganese and highly unsaturated omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids.
Adequate supplies of all these nutrients are critical for healthy brain development and function, and yet many women of childbearing age have seriously sub-optimal or deficient intakes of at least some of these key brain nutrients.
In developed countries, deficiencies during pregnancy of the long-chain omega-3 fats (EPA and DHA) have become particularly common in modern diets owing to reductions in fish and seafood consumption, as these are the only natural foods that provide appreciable quantities of the long-chain omega-3 EPA and DHA.
This matters - because a huge body of research shows that maternal deficiences of omega-3 DHA in pregnancy lead to sub-optimal mental and physical health outcomes for the resulting children (via many different mechanisms).
- These two new systematic reviews, by leading researchers in the field, show that higher intakes of fish and seafood during pregnancy predict significantly better outcomes for children's brain development, behaviour and cognition.
Importantly, the consistency of these findings provides very powerful real-world evidence that the nutritional benefits of consuming fish and seafood for brain development and function in both pregnancy and childhood far outweigh any possble risks from potential contaminants.
Unfortunately, public health advice and official dietary guidelines - let alone the media - still give more
emphasis to the possible risks -leading many people to avoid consuming or recommending fish and seafood during pregnancy and childhood.
As these systematic reviews make clear, no actual risks from eating fish and seafood - even in very large quantities, have ever been demonstrated in humans - only benefits
These findings indicate that official dietary advice is likely to be doing more harm than good, and that revising it to reflect the scientific evidence would lead to significant public health benefits.
For more information on this topic, see:
And for more information on this topic, see also the following lists of articles, which are frequently updated: