Food and Behaviour Research

Donate Log In

ADHD & Dyslexia: What Can Diet Do? - WATCH HERE

The first lawsuit against ultra-processed foods

by Marion Nestle

hamburger-207295_1280.jpg by Pixabay

The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee may not think there is much to ultra-processed foods (UPF), but companies making them have just been served with a lawsuit.

FAB RESEARCH COMMENT:

Governments and their public health agencies have continued to 'turn a blind eye' to the ever-increasing evidence that Ultra-Processed Foods (UPF) are a key causal factor in the so-called 'epidemics' of obesity, diabetes, non-alcoholic (or metabolic) fatty liver disease and other 'Non-Communicable Diseases' (NCD).

Now, it appears that lawyers in the US will be considering that evidence - as reported in this blog by Marion Nestle.

For more information on the key issues in the 'Ultra-Processed Food Addiction' debate, see:


You may also find the following articles of interest:


And for more information on the thorny issue of whether UPF are actually 'addictive', please see or bookmark the following lists of articles, which are frequently updated:

18/12/24 - Food Politics

---------------------------

The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee may not think there is much to ultra-processed foods (UPF), but companies making them have just been served with a lawsuit.

I learned about this from a tweet (x) from Carlos Monteiro, the Brazilian public health professor who coined the UPF term.

CMonteiro_USP (@Carlos A. Monteiro) posted: A first-of-its-kind lawsuit against 11 UPF industries alleging they engineer their UPF products to be addictive with details on the actions taken to target children including internal memos, meetings & the research conducted to create addictive substances.

The lawsuit, filed by several law firms, is aimed at Big Food: Kraft, Mondelez, Post, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, General Mills, Nestle, Kellanova, WK Kellogg, Mars, and Conagra.

The suit charges that these firms, through their deliberate marketing, are making people sick.

Due to Defendants’ conduct, Plaintiff regularly, frequently, and chronically ingested their UPF, which caused him to contract Type 2 Diabetes and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Plaintiff is now suffering from these devastating diseases, and will continue to suffer for the rest of his life.

The suit makes interesting reading.

Some examples:

  • Big Tobacco companies intentionally designed UPF to hack the physiological structures of our brains.  These formulation strategies were quickly adopted throughout the UPF industry, with the goal of driving consumption, and defendants’ profits, at all costs.

  • The same MRI machines used by scientific researchers to study potential cures for addiction are used by UPF companies to engineer their products to be ever more addictive.

  • Big Tobacco repurposed marketing strategies designed to sell cigarettes to children and minorities, and aggressively marketed UPF to these groups.

  • The UPF industry now spends about $2 billion each year marketing UPF to children.

  • UPF increase the risks of disease because they are ultra-processed, not because of how many grams of certain nutrients they contain or how much weight gain they cause. Therefore, even attempts to eat healthfully are undermined by the ultra-processed nature of UPF. One cannot evade the risks caused by UPF simply by selecting UPF with lower calories, fat, salt, sugar, carbohydrates, or other nutrients.

  • The UPF industry is well aware of the harms they are causing and has known it for decades. But they continue to inflict massive harm on society in a reckless pursuit of profits.

Can’t wait to see what happens with this one.  Stay tuned.