FAB RESEARCH COMMENT:
Previous research has already shown that ultra-processed foods such as chocolate, cakes, or ice cream that are high in both sugar and fat, are 'hyper-palatable' and therefore override normal satiety mechanisms, leading to over-consumption.
(Much of that research has of course been done by the food industry, seeking to make their products even more 'hyper-palatable' - i.e. difficult to resist even when you are full already - as it is in their interests for people to eat more, so that they can sell more...)
This new study measured brain activity in volunteers who were randomly allocated to eat a daily snack for 8 weeks in addition to their usual diet. These were matched for calorie content, but while one was high in BOTH fat and sugar, the other was high in sugar only.
- Consumers of the high-fat, high-sugar snack showed significant increases in activity in 'reward' areas of the brain, which was interpreted as a 'rewiring' of their food preferences - i.e. an unconscious learning effect.
The lead author is quoted as saying that our preference for high-fat, high-sugar foods "
could be innate or develop as a result of being overweight. But we think that the brain learns this preference".
But there really is no reason to favour any single explanation, and
these factors are all interlinked to some extent in any case.
An abundance of good evidence indicates that consistent high exposure to high-sugar, high-fat, ultra-processed 'convenience' foods is a major contributor to the current worldwide epidemic of overweight, obesity and related eating disorders.
Randomised controlled trials have already shown that consuming ultra-processed vs whole or minimally processed foods for just one to two weeks leads to:
- overeating without being aware of it, and significant weight gain
- increased cravings for 'junk foods', even when feeling full; and memory problems
Other evidence shows that
mothers' diets during pregnancy can have a lasting influence on the taste and food preferences of her unborn child - as well as its metabolism and future health risks - via 'nutritional programming' effects - which involve a form of 'learning' from environmental experience/exposure, but become 'hardwired' or 'innate' because they permanently alter gene expression.
- these include the future ability of that child to resist high-fat, high-sugar foods - IF exposed to them
- which is the case for most children nowadays, as it also was for their parents - if not grandparents, given the dramatic changes in typical diets over recent decades...
Importantly, this study showed that it was
foods high in BOTH sugar AND fat that triggered the 'rewiring' of reward responses in the brain, not the calorie-matched control foods that were high in sugar only.
As usual, however, the sub-heading in this news article misleadingly refers to them only as 'high-fat' snacks.... not high-fat AND high-sugar - keeping up the myth that 'high-fat' foods and diets are the problem behind overeating - rather than the combination of high fat with high sugar content
(or with high salt, which also contributes to the 'hyperpalatibility' of the unhealthiest forms of ultra-processed food - i.e. the HFSS category).For details of the underlying research, see: